Editing Rant: Duplicates

Image courtesy of renjith krishnan at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Duplicate words and phrases are common in writing. Some of the verbiage redundancies are endemic to the writer’s vocabulary. These are “go-to words”. Words which pop up again and again for a writer. People “grabbing” someone or something by the hand, arm, neck, jacket – instead of clutching the purse, gripping the handle, grasping a hand.

As you write, become aware of your go-to words and record them in a “pre-edit” list. Search online for ways to work around the words. A good google search is “Alternate words for ____” – then look under the images. Lots of pretty pictures and words beyond simple thesaurus words. Don’t knock the thesaurus; it’s an awesome tool for this problem.

Other duplicate words are “echo words”. Once the word comes up, it becomes an “earwig” repeating several times. The word just seems to be awesome for that part of the manuscript. Echo words are harder to find than go-to words. The repetition of the go-to words raises flags in beta readers, as well as living and mechanical editors. Echo words may only show up twice in a manuscript, but those two uses are within three pages in a four-hundred page manuscript.

Finally among the duplicate words are the “overused words”. Words every author uses too much: just, said, felt, look, that, etc. 

Finding the balance between punching, snappy narrative and overprocessing often comes into play with dealing with duplicate words. Reworking an area overfilled with go-to and overused words often produces a better product. How much editing with a thesaurus at your side is too much, removing your voice from the manuscript, is a personal call between you and your editor.

Other Cool Blogs: McSweeney’s Nov 20, 2017

Acquired from the internet hive mind: Map of Hell by Sandro Botticelli painted between 1480 and 1490.

As mentioned in my March 1st posting, I am about to enter the Dark Night of Soul portion of tax season where every day funnels me lower and lower through the crushing end on April 17th. A fitting time to revisit “Dante’s Nine Circles of Hell, Reimagined for Linguistic Transgressions” by John Rauschenberg.

I spend too much time in the Second Circle: The Serial Comma.

 

Editing Rant: Redundant

Image courtesy of renjith krishnan at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

“Redundant” is a word I use a lot while editing. I’m not talking duplicate words or phrases, go-to words, or echo words. I’m talking about repeat of presenting information.

For example, the point-of-view character describes the villain of the story to someone. Two chapters later the POV describes the villain (or love-interest) to someone else using nearly the same phrases.

Recaps are well-and-good, once or twice in a book, especially an epic fantasy tome. So long as the recaps present the information in a slightly different fashion. Change up the words. One way to do this is having the events be described by a different character, and interpreting them from their viewpoint or with additional information. Have the recap pull double duty, showing something new in the characters or situation.

Most of all, TRUST YOUR READERS. They do have working memories.

Editing Rant: Redundant

Image courtesy of renjith krishnan at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Woohoo! Finally got a ‘department of redundancy department’ sentence for an edit. They do exist!

“At night I had a cheap combat suit I would don and fight crime at night. “

And a red lines goes through … there. Next sentence!

Other Cool Posts: Pictures

In a recent edit these two words showed up – both used properly and reversed (misspelled). One is telling a person they look good and the other is completing something, like a couple is a good match. Why, oh why, do I love editing so much?

Image created using a meme generator by Erin Penn